Entertainment journalist Arnold Asamoah Baidoo, associated with UTV, has expressed strong criticism towards Charles Nii Armah, popularly known as Shatta Wale. Shatta Wale claimed that Ghana would reap significant benefits if he were to perform at the O2 Arena. Arnold Asamoah Baidoo disagrees with Shatta Wale's stance, stating that such events at the O2 Arena primarily benefit the artists themselves by contributing to their financial prosperity.
Shatta Wale's argument takes a different angle. He points out that Ghanaians have labeled him as a "drug addict," which makes him question why he should put his life at risk to perform for Ghana or the music industry. Arnold, during his analysis on UTV's showbiz program, counters Shatta Wale's viewpoint. He emphasizes that Shatta Wale would be the one to gain the most if he were to perform at the O2 Arena, as he would be the recipient of the earnings from the event.
Arnold also raises a rhetorical question regarding an artist risking their life by performing at such a venue. He highlights that an artist's role is to engage the audience through their performance and connect with them, rather than dwelling on personal concerns like those voiced by Shatta Wale. According to Arnold, an artist's responsibilities encompass singing, recording songs, releasing albums, and embarking on tours, which are not in alignment with Shatta Wale's stance.
Arnold Asamoah Baidoo's comments are prompted by Asake's performance at the O2 Arena, which serves as a backdrop to the ongoing debate. The underlying sentiment is that while Shatta Wale's concerns are acknowledged, his perspective is not aligned with the conventional role and expectations of an artist. Ultimately, the discourse revolves around differing viewpoints on the significance of performing at the O2 Arena for both the artist and the country.
Story by: Edem Khlasic
0 Comments